The World Cup- The Guardian Is Just Wrong

World Cup victories can boost economies and decide elections - but not in the US
Simon Tisdall
Wednesday June 7, 2006
The Guardian


The United States always feels challenged by the World Cup. Unlike the Olympics, where Americans tend to dominate, the US has rarely shone in the tournament, although it famously defeated England in 1950. It is an 80-1 long shot this time and may struggle to overcome group stage opponents Ghana and the Czech Republic, let alone Italy. For Americans used to winning, there is something vaguely shocking about this.

But US soccer-related insecurity is political and cultural, too. For four weeks, the world shows its back to the number one nation. The usual hierarchies of power are turned upside-down; the agenda is no longer Washington's to command. It is not often that old enemies, such as Mexico, or relatively new ones, such as Iran, get the chance to "beat" the US. But either may do so in Germany if their teams progress.

While football has gained in popularity in the US in recent decades, and "soccer moms" have become a key electoral target group, the land of the Super Bowl and the World Series still finds it hard to accept the "beautiful game's" global supremacy. World Cups usually give rise to a spate of newspaper stories reassuring American readers that their national sports still have international appeal."
Simon, Simon, Simon. I have to tell you that you have completely misread the situation in the US. The overwhelming majority of people here don't give a rat's ass about soccer. It barely registers on the national scene.

It is not a matter of insecurity because frankly if it was important to enough people we could easily become a dominant force. We have the resources and the talent. It just isn't all that interesting to most Americans.

On a side note I have to say that I wouldn't want to see any election influenced by the results of a sporting event.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Don't feel too bad Jack, you can live your soccer dreams vicariously through your Australian allies.

Seems that Australia is in the world cup, even thou mighty US of A isn't.

On another note, I'm not much of a statistics kind of guy, but you can't ignore the population of Australia (who came 4th last Olympics with the medals per populace.)

On per head of population Australia kicked every one's butt including U.S of A

For a break down of Olympic medals and a pretty table, and To see why Australia has a chance in the world cup go here:

http://bagelblogger.blogspot.com/2006/06/australia-new-world-cup-champions.html

then: http://bagelblogger.blogspot.com/2006/06/10-men-hold-flood-gates-shut-go.html

best regards Aaron

Jack Steiner said...

Hi Aaron,

I don't feel badly at all. During the World Cup I'll sometimes watch a few games, but soccer is not something I watch/follow with any regularity.

Calling out

 Earth to SQ, Earth to SQ.