Does Having Children Prevent an Active Sex Life

(This is a retread of a piece I wrote last March, but the conversation came up again at the gym this evening and I thought that I'd revisit it.)

This is a topic that the boys and I have had on a number of occasions. It is usually a night on which we have gathered for an evening without wife or children to just spend a little
quiet time for ourselves.

We'll drink a few beers, shoot the breeze and at some point in the night we'll notice that there are attractive women walking by. They could be in groups of two or three or walking by themselves. They may or not be pushing strollers. It doesn't matter, there will be something about them that catches our eye and we'll try to be discreet about checking her out.

Since our significant others are not included in these affairs we may even spend a few moments talking about the eye candy we have been enjoying. And for a moment we might even quietly fantasize about her, what it would be like to be single and to be able to rejoin the hunt for a brief time. Of course we'll have conveniently forgotten all of the things we didn't like about being single, the fact that even if we were available she might still choose to ignore us. Just details and who likes details.

At some point someone will talk about what it was like before children. Spontaneous trips to Vegas or Hawaii, nights in which you walked in and took your wife in the kitchen or bathroom or some other random room in the house. Evenings in which you didn't have to worry about fitting sex into a schedule etc.

Don't get me wrong, one of the things I love about my friends is that they love being a father as much as I do. We get off on taking our sons to the park together and spending quality man time bonding with them. But every now and then you remember the past and wonder a little bit about the future.

So I have to say that I was pleased to read this article by Ayelet Waldman. It always made sense to me that our wives would have similar conversations to ours and that there would be at least one or more couples that were still very active in the bedroom.
"I HAVE been in many mothers' groups - Mommy and Me, Gymboree, Second-Time Moms - and each time, within three minutes, the conversation invariably comes around to the topic of how often mommy feels compelled to put out. Everyone wants to be reassured that no one else is having sex either. These are women who, for the most part, are comfortable with their bodies, consider themselves sexual beings. These are women who love their husbands or partners. Still, almost none of them are having any sex.

There are agreed upon reasons for this bed death. They are exhausted. It still hurts. They are so physically available to their babies - nursing, carrying, stroking - how could they bear to be physically available to anyone else?

But the real reason for this lack of sex, or at least the most profound, is that the wife's passion has been refocused. Instead of concentrating her ardor on her husband, she concentrates it on her babies. Where once her husband was the center of her passionate universe, there is now a new sun in whose orbit she revolves. Libido, as she once knew it, is gone, and in its place is all-consuming maternal desire. There is absolute unanimity on this topic, and instant reassurance.

Except, that is, from me.

I am the only woman in Mommy and Me who seems to be, well, getting any."
I am sure that there are some people out there who see this post as a complaint about my life. It is not that at all. Just a brief observation and comment about people. I find people to be incredibly interesting, it is one of the reasons I went into sales.

We have so many similarities and yet we are so very different. Our thoughts and ideas on how we view the world, the way in which we approach life are just so interesting to me. I think that this is one of the reasons why I enjoy blogging and reading other blogs so much.

The boys and talk about many things along these lines and the general topic. It is kind of interesting to me. Before we got married there were a lot of things that might have gotten tossed out there. You definitely heard about the wild women and their ways in the bedroom. You heard tales of love and conquest.

And then after we hooked up the shades came down. We all got be a little bit more guarded in what we told each other. It wasn't like we were all that detailed prior to this, but for many years we have been a little bit more circumspect. Now we circle around the topic two or three times before we are willing to broach it.

Billy wants to know if he has the only wife who received a ring and stopped offering oral sex. Ted wants to know if anyone else is told that once a week is as often as he should expect it because not one else has a wife who does better. Jim is strangely quiet, is he not sharing because he is living a dream life and doesn't want to upset the others, or is he embarrassed.

Bob says that he overheard his wife complaining to her friends that men are only interested in their own pleasure and suggests that perhaps that is the problem. Of course no one in the room admits to this and that is not to say that any one of us is guilty or innocent. It is just part of the conversation.

Those of us who work as the sole provider grumble a bit about not being given enough respect for the load that we carrry. Murmurs abound about being more appreciated for that and comments like "I know that is hard to be a full time mom, but give me some credit" float through the room.

And at times I wonder if the women's tales are all that different from ours. Slightly different complaints, but similar in nature. We all miss the time in which we were the focal point and now we have subjugated our own interests.

Returning to the story I cited earlier I wonder about a few things.

"And afterward my husband will say that we, he and I, are the core of what he cherishes, that the children are satellites, beloved but tangential.

He seems entirely unperturbed by loving me like this. Loving me more than his children does not bother him. It does not make him feel like a bad father. He does not feel that loving me more than he loves them is a kind of infidelity."

I don't think that you have to love your children the same way you love your spouse because it is a different kind of love. It is an all encompassing love for your children, but it doesn't have the same kind of passion. You don't make love to your children, but you make love to your spouse.

To me they are distinctly different and not something that you can judge as being right or wrong. I find it to be a very interesting topic and something that I want to mull over and consider in more detail.

The Auto Flush

In a few short months my son will turn 5 and the rest of my hair will fall from my head. My poor daughter will never know that her daddy once had very thick and curly black hair, but she'll be fine as I am sure that she'll appreciate that her own thick curly hair resembles what I used to have.

One of the great joys of being a parent is a toilet trained child. For obvious reasons this is something that makes all parties happy. And it is an experience that remains with you because there is something about bathrooms that the young folk find to be of interest, or at least my son and his friends.

They love checking out the restrooms of the various stores we hit. Wherever we go I can almost guarantee there will be a trip to the restroom just to inspect the area. And when we get in there I can also be assured that my son will want to see if there are any buttons to push, knobs to twist, levers to pull or doohickeys to play with.

One of his favorites used to be the fabulous autoflush because there were just so many ways to manipulate it.

But within the last week he has grown irritated with it because he feels as if it is robbing him of the right to flush the toilet. He is a big kid and if he used the toilet, by gum he should be both responsible for and allowed to flush it.

So courtesy of his displeasure with the autoflush he has asked his dear old dad to engage in acts of vandalism. What sorts of acts, well to quote him, "Dad, every time you see one you are going to break it and smash it and crush it and then throw it in the trash. And then you are going to kick the toilet so that it behaves."

Call me crazy, but the juvenile delinquent that lives inside me is kind of attracted to this idea. I admit it, I want to break it, smash it, crush it and then throw it away. But every time I think about it I have this image of old Luke cutting the tops off of those parking meters and you remember what happened to him.

They sent him off to a special camp where he got to play with the man with no eyes and learned about what happened when you have a failure to communicate.

And I am not so sure that I am real interested in that, but I can tell you that I can eat more than 60 eggs. But the more I think about it the less interest I have in spending time in such a place. Maybe I can just pretend to break it, smash it and crush it and then throw it away.

Nothing wrong with a little imagination.

Reader Feedback- What you Told Me

Hello all,

As always I have received a plethora of proclamations provided by participating plebians. Actually plebian is not an appropriate term, but I was enjoying myself and needed another 'p' word.

Within the past week I have received comments and email regarding the posts here on this blog and wanted to share some that caught my eye.

On the Speculation on Sharon's Thoughts thread Q Said:
"I don't think we'll see peace in the Middle East in our lifetime, Jack.

If anyone thinks the disengagement is going to buy peace, they're going to be sadly disappointed. The best one can hope for is that the disengagement will position Israel strategically for subsequent developments (military and political)."
I am in agreement with him, but with resignation. It really is a sad comment.

Stacey agreed with me regarding Frist and Intelligent Design:
"I'm with you on this issue. I think it's total bunk. I was so excited when Frist broke party with his stem cell support. But this is disappointing."
But Jim from Tulsa disagreed saying in an email:
"Evolution is an unproven theory. What does it hurt to expose people to multiple viewpoints."
A number of posters commented on the Work Linked To Brain Damage post.

Cindra shared the following:
"My family already has a inherited brain degenerative disease in our genes - Huntington's. I can tell you that, as a teacher, I can understand the connection. Aside from the humerous explanations, many of the older schools have asbestos, to say nothing of chalk dust, which has gone by the wayside. It would be interesting to see if these numbers change as asbestos is removed and chalk is no longer used."
I appreciated the insight. Call me slow, but I had forgotten about chalk dust and asbestos.

A number of readers wrote me about the All It Takes is a Good Hug and A little Love and the One More Post- A Good Hug posts.

They confirmed that there are a large number of people who are in need of a good hug. Share a little love with those around you.

'Trust Me, I Know'

I just broke one of my cardinal rules when I wrote 'Trust Me, I know.' I hate reading/hearing things like that because all too often they are said by people who haven't much substance to support their claims/allegations.

And now I have just made myself into one of those 'self-appointed' experts. I'll tell you where and when this kind of statement really began to irk me. It was in college and I was a heartbroken lad pining away over a girl.

The 'trust me, I know' crowd assured me that if I listened to their advice things would improve. Here is a sample of what I heard:
  1. You need to just grab her and kiss her. Don't let her push you away. trust me, I know, I am a girl and we love that.
  2. She is not interested and she never will be. I am sorry to tell you this, but trust me, I know, I am a girl and this is just the way that it is.
  3. Find a really 'hot' girl and start dating her. When she finds out that you are with a really 'hot chick' she'll come running back. Trust me, I know. I am a girl and that is how we act.
  4. Dude, you need to find a woman who looks just like her, date her and dump her. Trust me, I know. I have been there.
  5. You need to go learn in yeshiva. You are searching for the derech and until you find it, you'll never be ready for love. Trust me, I know. Before I went B'T I was just like you.
See what I mean. There is contradictory advice, not to mention an attitude that just irritated me.

But I have to switch gears. Earlier in this post I said that I broke one of my cardinal rules. There was a time in college when I tried to create a new saying by saying that I busted my bishop.

I wanted it to be a substitute for that line I mentioned, you know the one about breaking a cardinal rule. The problem was that any time I used it people thought that I was engaging in sexual innuendo.

One of these days I might have to try doing that again, but this time I'll come up with a better line, trust me, I know.

Keep The Bars Open Later & We'll Be Nicer

This story about the British and their pubs made me shake my head.
"LONDON -- It all seemed like such a good idea when the government proposed the law change in 2001: Eliminate Britain's notorious 11 p.m. bar closing times, and the nation would become a more civilized place.

Nightlife would thrive; residents and tourists alike would drink and eat continental-style into the early hours; and, most important, the British would start to lose their international reputation for drinking too heavily and getting into trouble. This was, after all, the 21st Century, nearly 100 years after the 11 p.m. closing was imposed to keep munitions workers producing shells for World War I.

But that was 2001. Four years later and with the deadline for licensing applications under the pending law nearing, there are screams of alarm throughout the news media, police, courts and parliamentary circles that allowing Britons to drink longer will make matters worse. They will, so the new argument goes, get more drunk over more time, cause more trouble and fill up more hospitals, courtrooms and jails."
Ok, call me crazy but I kind of suspect that the latter paragraph makes more sense. Give people more time to get drunk and watch the lunacy on the streets increase. Especially if the following is true:
"Binge drinking is considered so bad in England and Wales that senior judges have told the government's Home Office to expect alcohol-fueled violence to soar when the new law allows bars to stay open up to 24 hours a day.

"The situation is already grave, if not grotesque," wrote Warwick Judge Charles Harris in a report to the Home Office. "And to facilitate this by making drinking facilities more widely available is close to lunacy. It simply means that our towns and city centers are abandoned every night to tribes of pugnacious, drunk, noisy, vomiting louts."

But even the conservative Daily Telegraph has said it is not the pub hours that are the problem, it's the British character.

Culture of non-teetotalers

"There is no doubt we have a problem in this country in the way we drink alcohol," said a Telegraph editorial. "This is partly a lack of personal responsibility: We have never quite caught the continental habit of combining sensible amounts of wine with the related pleasures of fine food."

Historically, the British have been among Europe's heaviest drinkers, statistically imbibing not quite as much as the Germans or Finns but drinking heavily in short bursts."
One of these days I'll blog about my experiences in various pubs as I routinely slammed the sport of soccer/football as being a children's game suggested that if the hooligans really were men they wouldn't need such stupid excuses to run wild.

There is nothing like attacking the fragile male ego, trust me, I know.

A Question

How long do you have to live somewhere before you are no longer considered a settler.

400 Terrorist Attacks in 5 Years

During the past week or I have read commentary, been sent email or taken part in discussions in which people have served as terrorist apologists for groups like Hamas. It is considered in vogue and cool to explain to others how the US/Israel/Europe or the West in general is actually responsible for the actions of the terrorists.

It is a condescending attitude in which they essentially say that the poor terrorist had no other way to express themselves beyond murdering others. Pathetic apology if you ask me. Anyway I thought that this was interesting.

Hamas Details Past Attacks in Gaza Strip

"GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - Hamas militants, jockeying to take credit for Israel's Gaza Strip pullout, said they were involved in 54 percent of 400 attacks on Israeli targets in Gaza in the past five years.

The figures appeared on a Hamas Web site Monday, the day Israel set out to clear the last of its 21 Gaza settlements, Netzarim. Hamas said its numbers were reliable because they were culled from Israeli military statistics — a claim that could not immediately be verified.

Hamas and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas have been engaged in fierce competition over who will be credited with the Gaza pullout, a unilateral Israeli move. Hamas said its attacks have driven Israel out, while Abbas hopes to gain political capital from eventual improvement in the daily life of Gazans as a result of the withdrawal.

Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said the figures "are a document of Hamas' struggle and Hamas' role in liberating this precious part of the homeland."

They show that "resistance is the Palestinians' strategy of choice," Abu Zuhri said.

"It made this victory possible, and this victory can be repeated," he said, referring to Israel's Gaza withdrawal.

According to the figures posted by Hamas, the group was involved in 217 of 400 attacks against Israeli targets between September 2000, when the second Palestinian uprising against Israel began, and Aug. 15, 2005, the date Israel began pulling out of Gaza.

The Al Aqsa Brigades, affiliated with Abbas' ruling Fatahparty, were responsible for 22 attacks, or 5.5 percent of the total. The Islamic Jihad carried out 34 attacks, or 8.5 percent of the total, according to the Hamas claim.

Hamas also claimed responsibility for killing 79 of the 167 Israeli soldiers who the group said died in militant attacks in Gaza in the past five years. Other factions killed 37 soldiers, or 22.2 percent of the total. Fifty-one soldiers, or 30.5 percent of the total, died in joint operations, Hamas said.

Hamas also suffered the most fatalities, according to the group's statistics. A total of 145 of the 215 militants killed, or 67.5 percent, belonged to Hamas. Islamic Jihad ranked second, with 28 gunmen dead, followed by Fatah, with 23 fatalities.

Deadly Hamas attacks on Israeli targets waned this year after the group entered into an informal truce with Israel. Abu Zuhri said the truce was in force until the end of the year."

The line in the story that says "145 of the 215 militants killed" caught my eye. How many of these attacks were launched by suicide bombers. They were not killed by Israel, they killed themselves and that is an important distinction.

400 attacks and that only covers Gaza. Just consider how many in total were committed.

Not Dead Yet

Been a whole slew of crazy things that have happened since I last updated this joint.  It is not an exaggeration to say I am not dead yet, c...