A historian named Richard Breitman writes about James G. McDonald, who was chairman of Roosevelt's advisory committee on refugees. Apparently McDonald met Hitler and became convinced that he intended to wipe the Jews out.
This USA Today article has some interesting information:
Breitman says McDonald's papers soften that view, showing that in 1938, Roosevelt:• Cut red tape that kept immigration quotas from being filled, allowing entry for 27,370 Germans — most of them Jews.
• Hoped to resettle millions of Jews from Central and Eastern Europe to other countries, mostly in Latin America. He called an international conference to line up money and support.
• Promised to ask Congress for $150 million to help resettle refugees if Britain allowed more Jews into Palestine and private funds could be raised.
Roosevelt's efforts, including the conference in Évian, France, failed. Most countries refused to admit Jews amid a depression and anti-Semitism, Breitman says. Opposition also was strong at the State Department and in Congress, which voted in 1939 not to let in 20,000 German Jewish children.
Breitman says Roosevelt is unfairly criticized for not supporting the bill and refusing to admit 900 Jewish refugees on the St. Louis, which sailed from Germany 70 years ago this month. Cuba, the U.S. and Canada turned away those on the "voyage of the damned," and the ship returned to Europe. Hundreds of passengers died in the Holocaust.
Roosevelt "made a decision to go for big results," Breitman says, adding that the president viewed letting in small numbers of Jews as "a gesture, not a solution" to the larger refugee problem.
In 1940, after the start of World War II in Europe, Roosevelt's priorities turned to national security, Breitman writes.
Rafael Medoff, director of the Wyman Institute, which studies America's response to the Holocaust, says the book won't absolve Roosevelt. He says FDR failed to take "concrete steps" such as giving Jewish refugees temporary haven in U.S. territories such as the Virgin Islands.
I have to think about this one a little bit, 900 refugees is not insignificant. Still, if this is all true it is worth reconsidering our thoughts about FDR.
2 comments:
I think that this is not uncommon. There was considerable reluctance all round to taking in Jewish refugees and a great deal of persuasion had to take place in many countries to take in a relatively small number of people. This is equally true of the British government at the time, I am embarrassed to say.
There is a beautiful monument to the Kindertransport at Liverpool Street Station that I pass at least once each week. I know someone who was part of that precious transport and it touches me every time that if he hadn't been lucky enough, he would not have survived (his parents were killed).
Here's a link to the picture, from the artist's website:
http://www.frank-meisler.com/product.asp?cat_id=9&product=Z12
rachel
It is a shameful tale, the unwillingness of the world to help. Not that it is so different today, Africa burns and the world is indifferent.
Post a Comment